Duality of Meaning of some English Words: What’s on the Minds of Beginner Mining and Related Engineering Students?

Authors

  • Patricia Beatrice Mireku-Gyimah University of Mines and Technology (UMaT), Tarkwa

Keywords:

Mining, engineering, normal, scientific, meaning

Abstract

The paper studied the meanings of 12 selected English words as written by 289 First Year students offering Mining and Related Engineering programmes at the University of Mines and Technology (UMaT), Tarkwa. The words, namely elevation, surveying, function, sign, model, drive, conductor, power, force, stress, spring, and shear have more than one meaning each - a normal meaning, and a scientific/engineering meaning. The objective of the study was to discover what goes on in the beginner engineering students’ minds when communicating in English, using those words and thereby find out whether they know both the scientific/engineering meanings and the normal meanings of the words. The “writing†exercise was not a test, so the students were relaxed and wrote all the meanings they naturally knew for each word, anonymously, but without reference to dictionaries. The responses were sorted out into five categories as appropriate. The results showed that, out of a total of 289 students, 84 (29.07%) gave only scientific/engineering meanings of some words, 153 (53.00%) gave only normal meanings of some words, 15 (5.16%) gave both scientific/engineering meanings and normal meanings of some words, 32 (11.07%) gave no meanings (nil) of some words, and 5 (1.70%) gave wrong meanings of some words. Contrary to expectation, the majority of the students gave either scientific/engineering meanings only or normal meanings only of some words. Only a few gave both scientific/engineering meanings and normal meanings of some words. Thus, the students possibly have vocabulary challenges. To overcome the challenges, the students should learn and use the different meanings of English words appropriately; lecturers should explain the shades of meaning whenever such words are met in speech or writing; polysemy and homonymy should be emphasised in the Communication Skills syllabus; and yearly follow-up research to track the students’ progress should be conducted.

References

Algeo, J. and Pyles, T. (2004), The Origins and Development of the English Language, 5th ed., Wadsworth, Boston, 370 pp.

Anon. (1987), The New Collins Dictionary and Thesaurus in One Volume, ed. McLeod, W. T. William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd, Glasgow, 1173 pp.

Anon. (1999), Encarta World English Dictionary Microsoft Encarta, Bloomsbury, 2172 pp.

Anon. (2005), Collins English Dictionary., Desktop Edition + CD-Rom, Harper Collins Publishers Ltd, Glasgow, 1911 pp.

Anon. (2015a), Dictionary.reference.com

Anon. (2015b), The Free Dictionary.com

Crystal, D. and Davy, D. (1969), Investigating English Style, Indiana UP, Indiana, 264 pp.

Finegan, E. (2008), Language: Its Structure and Use, 5th ed. (Int. Student Ed.), Thomson Wadsworth, 567 pp.

Gregory, M. and Carroll, S. (1978), Language and Situation: Language Varieties and their Social Contexts, Routledge and Kegan Paul, xi, London, 113 pp.

Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. and Strevens, P. (1964), The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching, Longman, 322 pp.

Hudson, R. A. (1990), Sociolinguistics, U of Cambridge, Cambridge, 250 pp.

Mireku-Gyimah, P. B. (2003), Unit 11: “The World of Medicineâ€, Gateway to English for Senior Secondary Schools , Students’ Bk 2, eds. Grant, N. and Dadzie, A. B. K., Longman, Essex, pp. 110-121.

Mireku-Gyimah, P. B. (2008), “Do Students of Mining and Allied Engineering Programmes have any problems in English?†Ghana Mining Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 48-62.

Quirk, R. and Greenbaum, S. (2000), A University Grammar of English, Longman, New Delhi, 484 pp.

Thakur, D. (2007), Linguistics Simplified: Semantics, Bharanti Bhawan, New Delhi, 147 pp.

Yule, G. (2006), The Study of Language, 3rd ed., Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 273 pp.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-16

Issue

Section

Communication and Business Mgt Articles